“Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.” -John F. Kennedy

Parshat Terumah emphasizes the act of giving in the command to build the Mishkan. At first glance, the Torah seems ambiguous about this expectation. It instructs, “Take for Me an offering (terumah),” implying obligation, yet immediately adds, “From every person whose heart moves them,” suggesting voluntarism. Was the giving required, or freely chosen? This tension offers a model for one of the touchstone issues confronting Israeli society today: who should be contributing to the defense of Medinat Yisrael?

Rashi resolves the contradiction by explaining that there were three distinct contributions. Two were chovah – fixed, obligatory donations given equally by all through the machatzit ha-shekel – and one was nedavah, a voluntary gift offered according to the generosity of the heart. Participation was not optional; what varied was how each person gave. Everyone had a share in building the Mishkan.

The Lubavitcher Rebbe likewise understood the Mishkan’s diverse materials as representing the full spectrum of the Jewish people – different backgrounds and levels of observance, yet all indispensable. The Mishkan was not the project of a single group, but a collective achievement.

This vision offers a compelling model for the State of Israel. Troubling images from recent days urge us to rediscover our common bond as a society, to strive for what Rabbi Jonathan Sacks called a nation built on a covenant of “We” – a society built on belonging and mutual responsibility. Like the Mishkan, especially in these challenging days, the strength of the State of Israel depends on the willingness of all its people to see themselves as builders of a common home. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson