Vezot Habracha: Was Shimon Cancelled?

Leave a comment

The final words of the Torah, in Vezot Habracha, contain a message about how to relate to acts of zealotry and intolerance and at the same time, provide a proactive template for how the Jewish nation can allow for diversity while retaining togetherness.

Just as Yacov gives brachot to his sons at the end of Bereshit, Moshe blesses the tribes – Bnei Yisrael – at the end of Devarim. One glaring difference is that the tribe of Shimon disappears from the list in Devarim. Some commentaries explain that the bracha for Shimon was contained within the bracha to Yehuda through the language “Shema Hashem” which contains part of Shimon’s name. Yet the Midrash Sifrei suggests otherwise: Yacov’s blessing to Shimon and Levi condemns their act of zealotry in the story of Shechem. Levi corrected their behavioral tendency toward intolerance and violence. However, the tribe of Shimon continued to act with zealous violence when Pinchas slayed the Midianite woman and sinning Israelite at Shittim. The message of this midrash: The absence of Shimon from Moshe’s blessings of the tribes is a reminder of the dangers of zealotry and intolerance and a rejection of extremism. 

Vezot Habracha also positively advocates for tolerance: “Then [God] became King in Jeshurun…The tribes of Israel together.” Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai likens “the tribes of Israel together” to two separate boats which were banded together and then built upon with impressive edifices. If the ships remain bonded together, the structure endures. If separated, it collapses. Also, Moshe gives brachot to the people as a whole, then to the individual tribes and then concludes with more blessings for the Jewish nation. This movement from national to individual to national highlights the importance of maintaining the individual character of segments of the Jewish people while also serving as a reminder that we are responsible for each other as a nation.

May the completion of the Torah this chag be a continued source of blessing for Am Yisrael. May the voices of tolerance be heard more than the voices of zealotry and extremism. And, may we value individualism and diversity, while also remaining connected to each other as a nation. Shabbat Shalom and Chag sameach! -Karen Miller Jackson

p.s. I also want to thank you for joining me for this year of Power Parsha and for your wonderful feedback! This coming year will focus on parsha and contemporary issues. Please think of a friend or two who might like to receive Power Parsha and send them this link! Also if you already receive Power Parsha, no need to sign up again:-) Here is a link to send friends:

To subscribe to “Power Parsha,” a short dvar Torah on the topic of parsha and contemporary issues by Karen Miller Jackson via whatsapp: https://chat.whatsapp.com/CKLpCygJaBf20sKbNmRV1u or via email here: https://karenmillerjackson.com/

Parshat Korach: Power of Community

Leave a comment

Community is an essential part of Judaism. Parshat Korach is about the risks of separating oneself from the community, which resonates through today.

Rashi highlights that Korah’s separateness is already expressed in the first verse: “And Korach took…” It does not say what he took; it only lists a few of his followers. Rashi, citing midrash Tanhuma teaches: He purposely took himself out of the community to make machloket (conflict). The story continues with Korah’s claims, refusal to engage in dialogue with Moshe and Aaron and punishment. How surprising it is then that Korah’s “edah” (community) is the source in the Talmud for the requirement to pray in a minyan (quorum) of ten men! (There is also value placed on praying as part of a tzibbur – of men and women). 

The source for minyan in the Talmud is derived from a verbal analogy in Torah. Vayikra states that God should be sanctified “among” Bnei Yisrael. The word among is also used when God instructs Moshe to separate from “among” Korah’s community (edah), as attempts to reason with them were futile. The word edah is also used in the story of the spies, from which the number ten is derived for minyan. So the basis for communal prayer is derived from two groups of great sinners. 

Perhaps this was not only a literary connection, but rather a deeper point expressed by the rabbis. Separating and not engaging with diverse perspectives can lead to isolation and extremism. By deriving minyan from such imperfect models, the Sages encourage openness and inclusiveness within communities. This allows for people of varying religious commitments, or who feel less worthy, to take part in communal prayer. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson