Parshat Korach: The Battle for Truth

Leave a comment

The sin of Korach and his followers is ambiguous in the biblical text, leaving room for multiple interpretations. Yet when we read Parshat Korach today, one perspective stands out: their sin lay in their duplicity. It is a story that speaks directly to our world today, where the value of truth is increasingly under threat.

The Torah does not specify how Korach incited rebellion, but Rashi interprets the words “And Korach took” to mean he took others through persuasive and manipulative speech. According to the Midrash, Korach swayed followers with a fictional story about a widow exploited by Moshe and Aharon – misusing biblical verses and portraying them as corrupt leaders who demanded her last possessions. As Nechama Leibowitz notes, Korach’s choice of a widow is no accident. It is a calculated move to arouse the compassion and indignation of his audience. He crafts a narrative of victimhood, cloaked in the language of Torah.

Korach’s allies, Datan and Aviram, similarly distort the truth. “Is it not enough that you brought us out of a land flowing with milk and honey to kill us in the wilderness?” they ask—referring not to the Promised Land, but to Egypt. In the wake of the spies’ report, they exploit the people’s despair, twisting sacred words once used by God and Moshe to describe the Land of Israel. 

This is the essence of post-truth: misinformation that appeals to emotion while obscuring reality. We saw this just this week—in misleading headlines and political campaigns built on lies about Israel. The Talmud notes that the letters in שקר (falsehood) are close together in the Hebrew alphabet, while those in אמת (truth) are far apart—teaching that falsehood is easily found, but truth must be pursued with great effort. That is the enduring lesson of the Korach story: seek truth, and pursue it. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson

Korach: Community with Diversity

Leave a comment

Community is an essential part of Judaism. Parshat Korach is about the risks of separating oneself from the community or collective, a theme that remains relevant today.

The opening words allude to Korach’s divisiveness: “And Korach took…” It does not say what he took; it only lists a few of his followers. Ibn Ezra interprets this to mean he took others – anyone with a grievance – into his group. Rashi teaches: He purposely took himself out of the community to make a machloket (conflict). Ramban, citing the midrash, comments that Korach did not “take” anything; rather, his heart took control of him. Korach had been harboring his grievances and waited until Moshe’s leadership was weakened to take action. All of these interpretations highlight Korach’s refusal to engage in dialogue and his inability to find common ground with Moshe and Aaron.

How surprising it is then that Korach’s “edah” (congregation) is the source in the Talmud for the requirement to pray in a minyan (quorum) of ten men. The source for minyan is derived from a verbal analogy: Vayikra states that God should be sanctified “among” Bnei Yisrael. The word among is also used when God instructs Moshe to separate from “among” Korach’s “edah,” as attempts to reason with them were futile. The word “edah” is also used in the story of the spies, from which the number ten is derived for minyan. So the basis for communal prayer is derived from two groups of great sinners. 

Perhaps this was not only a literary connection, but rather a deeper point expressed by the rabbis. Separating and not engaging with diverse perspectives can lead to isolation and extremism. By deriving minyan from such imperfect models, the Sages encourage openness and inclusiveness within communities. This can also serve as a model for broader society—embracing diversity and debate while upholding a shared commitment. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson

Parshat Korach: Community

Leave a comment

Community is an essential part of Judaism. Parshat Korach is about the risks of separating oneself from the community, which resonates through today.

Rashi highlights that Korach’s separateness is already expressed in the first verse: “And Korach took…” It does not say what he took; it only lists a few of his followers. Rashi, citing midrash Tanchuma teaches: He purposely took himself out of the community to make machloket (conflict). The story continues with Korach’s claims, refusal to engage in dialogue with Moshe and Aaron and punishment. How surprising it is then that Korach’s “edah” (community) is the source in the Talmud for the requirement to pray in a minyan (quorum) of ten men! (Separately, there is also value placed on praying as part of a tzibbur – of men and women). 

The source for minyan in the Talmud is derived from a verbal analogy in Torah. Vayikra states that God should be sanctified “among” Bnei Yisrael. The word among is also used when God instructs Moshe to separate from “among” Korach’s “edah,” as attempts to reason with them were futile. The word “edah” is also used in the story of the spies, from which the number ten is derived for minyan. So the basis for communal prayer is derived from two groups of great sinners. 

Perhaps this was not only a literary connection, but rather a deeper point expressed by the rabbis. Separating and not engaging with diverse perspectives can lead to isolation and extremism. By deriving minyan from such imperfect models, the Sages encourage openness and inclusiveness within communities. This allows for people of varying religious commitments, or who feel less worthy, to take part in communal prayer. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson

Parshat Korach: Power of Community

Leave a comment

Community is an essential part of Judaism. Parshat Korach is about the risks of separating oneself from the community, which resonates through today.

Rashi highlights that Korah’s separateness is already expressed in the first verse: “And Korach took…” It does not say what he took; it only lists a few of his followers. Rashi, citing midrash Tanhuma teaches: He purposely took himself out of the community to make machloket (conflict). The story continues with Korah’s claims, refusal to engage in dialogue with Moshe and Aaron and punishment. How surprising it is then that Korah’s “edah” (community) is the source in the Talmud for the requirement to pray in a minyan (quorum) of ten men! (There is also value placed on praying as part of a tzibbur – of men and women). 

The source for minyan in the Talmud is derived from a verbal analogy in Torah. Vayikra states that God should be sanctified “among” Bnei Yisrael. The word among is also used when God instructs Moshe to separate from “among” Korah’s community (edah), as attempts to reason with them were futile. The word edah is also used in the story of the spies, from which the number ten is derived for minyan. So the basis for communal prayer is derived from two groups of great sinners. 

Perhaps this was not only a literary connection, but rather a deeper point expressed by the rabbis. Separating and not engaging with diverse perspectives can lead to isolation and extremism. By deriving minyan from such imperfect models, the Sages encourage openness and inclusiveness within communities. This allows for people of varying religious commitments, or who feel less worthy, to take part in communal prayer. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson