Bereshit: Taking Responsibility

Why does the Torah begin with stories of human failings? Parshat Bereshit offers insight into human nature and the foundations of moral responsibility.

Adam and Chava are permitted to eat from any tree in the Garden of Eden except the Tree of Knowledge. Yet temptation gets the better of them, and they sin. Worse still, neither takes responsibility. When God asks Adam, “Ayeka?” (“Where are you?”), Adam blames Chava, who in turn blames the serpent. Their son Kayin becomes the first murderer. After killing his brother Hevel, God asks, “Where is your brother?” Kayin notoriously responds, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” Once again, responsibility is evaded.

Nechama Leibowitz describes Parshat Bereshit as portraying the gradual “decline of man.” Adam and Kayin are followed by Lemech, who boasts of killing a man, and the bnei ha’elohim, who, now acting as a group, take women as they please, reflecting a widespread abuse of power. Perhaps this is precisely the Torah’s message: When individuals, and ultimately societies, fail to take responsibility for their actions, the consequences extend beyond the original wrongdoing, leading to further moral decline.

Yet Bereshit Rabbah offers a more hopeful perspective. After Kayin is judged by God, Adam asks about his sentence. Kayin replies that he repented and received a reduced punishment. Astonished, Adam exclaims, “Such is the power of teshuva, and I did not know!” He then recites the words, “It is good to give thanks to God” (Psalm 92), with the Hebrew lehodot suggesting both gratitude and confession.

By acknowledging wrongdoing and taking responsibility, we can break the cycle of blame and moral decline. Perhaps this is why the Torah begins with human failings: to remind us that moral growth begins with responsibility, both individual and collective. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson


Parshat Shoftim: Great Responsibility

“With great power comes great responsibility.” In Parshat Shoftim, societal leaders—whether judges, prophets, sages, or kings—are commanded to pursue justice and adhere to a strict code of ethical behavior. However, there are times when every individual is called upon to engage in introspection and take responsibility for the welfare of society as well.

Devarim 21 describes the mysterious ceremony, done in biblical times, of “eglah arufah.” When a murder victim is discovered outside a city and the identity of the killer is unknown, the elders of the closest city take an unworked heifer and break its neck. Then there is a two-part tikkun. First, the leaders are called upon to take responsibility, which consists of a declaration: “Our hands did not shed this blood, nor did our eyes see it done,” and then a prayer to God: “Absolve Your people Israel whom You redeemed…” 

What is the purpose of the leaders declaring “our hands did not shed this blood”? Rashi, citing midrash Sifrei asks, “do we really think the elders are murderers?” Rather, they mean that they never encountered this victim, and they did not leave a vulnerable person without help. This ritual underscores the value the Torah places on each and every life and the heavy responsibility on leaders to protect their people. Why, then, do they pray that God absolves all of Israel and not just themselves? When an innocent life is taken and justice is not served, the moral deficiency can reverberate in the nearby city and throughout all of Israel. So all of Israel must pause and reflect on what has occurred. This is why the tefillah seeks redemption for the entire nation. 

The eglah arufah is no longer practiced, but its core ideas remain relevant—especially this week. May the memories of Alexander, Almog, Carmel, Eden, Hersh, and Ori be a source of societal healing and redemption in our time. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson


Parshat Devarim & Tisha B’Av: Response to Historical Trauma

The book of Devarim is also called mishneh Torah, the “repetition” of the Torah. The retelling of one story in particular – the meraglim (spies) – offers deeper insight into the purpose of this final book of the Torah and serves as a foundation for processing historical traumas in a constructive manner.

The first historical narrative Moshe shares with the second generation in the desert is the story of the spies. As Rav Tamir Granot points out, it is not the Exodus, the revelation at Sinai nor the sin of the golden calf. Why this story? Additionally, there are differences between the way this story is told here and how it is presented in Bamidbar. In Devarim, it is not God who initiates the sending of scouts, but rather the nation. And, it is not the spies, the tribal leaders, who spread criticism of the land, but the people. Rav Granot writes that Moshe chose to retell this story because its lessons were most relevant for this generation. Bamidbar’s version emphasized the failings of the leaders. In Devarim, Moshe emphasizes the people’s responsibility over the faults and failings of their leaders. 

A similar approach was taken by the rabbis in retelling the story of the churban, commemorated on Tisha B’Av. Historical sources and the Talmud contain stories of corrupt priests at the end of the Second Temple period. There is also the tale of enmity between Qamtza and Bar Qamtza and the silence of the rabbis who were with them, which led to the destruction of Jerusalem. Our leaders failed us then and some took responsibility for it. Ultimately, the rabbis teach, it was because of sinat chinam – worthless hatred between the people – that God destroyed the Temple.

Moshe’s imperative to us which resonates so deeply today: We need to hold our leaders accountable and learn from past failings. And yet, blame alone won’t get us very far. The most effective response to historical trauma, both then and now, is a call to responsibility for every member of the Jewish people. Shabbat Shalom -Karen Miller Jackson